ampage
Tube Amps / Music Electronics
For current discussions, please visit Music Electronics Forum.

ampage archive

Vintage threads from the first ten years

Search for:  Mode:  

 

Marshall: JTM45 vs 1987 circuit. BIG gain difference?


 :
6/19/2005 2:46 PM
dave b
Marshall: JTM45 vs 1987 circuit. BIG gain difference?
Can you really crank a 5F6-A Bassman (AKA old JTM45)to 10 and it just kinda purrs? But where is the CLEAN volume?  
 
You see, I've built a single channel marshall/bassman type amp with a switch that adds a .68 cap across the 820 ohm cathode resistor. So basically without the cap it's a Bassman/JTM45 and with cap engaged it's a 1987/1959 Superlead circuit.  
 
The difference in gain is dramatic to say the least. in JTM45 mode I can turn up the volume all the way up and I get a nice smooth distortion that is not super loud but still sounds good.  
 
In "Superlead" mode it is as loud at 1/4 to 1/3 volume setting as the totally cranked JTM45 mode is. If I crank it to 10 the amp just squeals.  
 
I thought I'd get a louder clean tone in JTM45 mode but the amp doesn't really have any useful volume until at least 1/2 way up. Does that seem right to you?  
 
How could this circuit ever be useful as a bass amp?  
 
I'm seeing 180vdc on the 1st stage plate. If I inject a 1k/1v sinewave I get 41 vac off the 1st coupling cap. Does that seem like the correct gain?  
 
The amp seems plenty loud as a "Superlead" but not loud enough as a "JTM45". Should there be that much difference in gain between the two circuits?  
 
(Cathode on 1st gain stage is 1.5k w/a 15uf cap.)
 
6/19/2005 3:44 PM
Chris@CMWamps

Hi Dave  
 
A 5F6A does have more gain then a JTM45.  
There are a couple of differences between a JTM45 and a plexi 1987 (notes on plexi);  
- seperated V1 cathodes; different voicing and tighter low-end  
- 470k mixing-resistors; slightly tighter low-end and sweeter highs  
- brightness- and coupling-caps (tighter low-end, more mids and highs)  
- cap on V2 cathode  
- tonestack (fatter, less loss in gain)  
- gainfactor poweramp (gain in PI)  
- output- and powertransformers, chokes  
- coupling-caps to outputtubes (tighter low-end)  
 
A JTM45 should be pretty clean till around 5 or 6, plexies with a 5000p brightcap do rock above 2 :)  
 
Try a 820/.68-4u7 on the 1st cathode. What's your neg.feedback-resistor and what iron are you using? What's the B+?  
 
Hope this helps,  
 
Chris  
Love, peace & loudness  
http://www.CMWamps.com
 
6/19/2005 7:07 PM
dave b

Since the early JTM45's were supposed to be a copy of a 5F6-A I can't see why the 5F6-A would have more gain. I've got schems of those early 45's and they are the same circuit-wise.  
 
I'm using a Delft/Obsolete Electronics JTM45 RS spares repo OT. The power supply has power scaling and sag control with a Twin Reverb PT. At full up I'm getting 460V on the plates. (KT66's,45ma per tube)  
 
B+ on the Input stage plate is 180v some schematics show 150v in this position so I think we're in the ballpark a tad on the high side  
 
I've got a pull pot on the presence control that lets me switch the feedback resistor to 27k or 47k.  
There's a subtle gain change but not as significant as the cathode bypass cap switching.  
 
It's like a double "Fat" switch made with an on/off/on switch for the 1st stage cathode.  
Up position = 15uf cathode bypass (1st)  
Middle position = .68 cathode bypass (1st)  
Down position = .68 cathode bypass on 1st  
and 2nd gain stage  
 
The down position is the one that really sizzles, kinda like the bright channel of a 1987 or 1959 Marshall. I might try the lower value cathode cap on the 1st stage.  
 
Instead of parallel channels I'm using V1B as a gain stage in series with the input stage. This give the amp lots of grind compared with jumpering the two parallel channels.  
 
Thanks for the feedback Chris; sounds like the circuit (JTM45) is doing what it's supposed to do. I still can't see how this could ever have been a good circuit for bass unless you like to play real quiet.  
 
Db
 
6/19/2005 7:41 PM
anonymous
If you're running v1b in series instead of parallel, that gives you a lot more gain right there.
 
6/20/2005 5:02 AM
Chris@CMWamps

Hi Dave  
 
"...I can't see why the 5F6-A would have more gain. I've got schems of those early 45's and they are the same circuit-wise."  
 
If you do connect the 27k resistor to a 2 ohms tap you'll get more gain then with the same resistor connected to the 16 ohms tap.  
 
The less voltage is fed to the 27k/presence-pot-junction the less feedback so more gain, the voltage at the 16 ohms tap is higher then at the 2 ohms tap. I can calculate an alternative value but I need more coffee :) :D LOL (but feel free to contact me if needed).  
 
I'd forgot to mention this: the tweed Bassman does use a 12AY7 as V1 and there isn't a cap across one of the mixing-resistors going to V2 so the 5F6A does have less pre-amp-gain but more power-amp-gain.  
 
Try getting that plate-voltage around 150 Volts, the sound will become somewhat warmer and a bit more "gainy".  
 
Vintage bass-amps: imho the 1st real stage-bass-amp was the Ampeg SVT.  
Maybe they used smaller bass-amp so you couldn't hear that guy that couldn't play guitar being forced to play bass :) :D LOL  
 
Chris
 
6/20/2005 6:46 AM
Chris@CMWamps
and after some coffee
:)  
 
Hi Dave  
 
For a 5F6A PI/power-amp-gain with a 16 ohms output at 30-50 Watts you can use a 82k neg.feedback-resistor.  
 
Hope this helps,  
 
Chris  
Love, peace & loudness  
http://www.CMWamps.com
 
6/20/2005 9:46 AM
dave b

Thanks Chris I'LL check what tap I'm getting feedback from.  
 
Db
 

  Page 1 of 2 Next> Last Page>>