| ampage Tube Amps / Music Electronics |
For current discussions, please visit Music Electronics Forum. |
| previous: SK Pickup "copies" rant -- 8/31/2002 4:31 PM |
| Weevil | Re: Pickup "copies" rant I am a player, and I have been mixing and matching poles, magnets, pots, wire, caps and jacks for some moons now. It's all about tone. The pickups are just another part of the equation that you can break down into more puzzle pieces. It's like the insanity stops when you want it to. Engineering types all have the same mission, if you can't make it better, make it mine. Yada yada yada. Guitar(tone)woods, thicknesses, construction methods and string suspension schemes all play a large part in the quest for tone. The thing that lets you match a pickup to a guitar for a decent shot at whatever tone you're trying to get is as much consistency as you can get in the frequency and output in a pickup. After years of using the stuff that Duncan, dimarzio, Bill Lawrence and some others make commercially available to us, I know the difference between a Tone Zone and A J.B. for example, and have a pretty good Idea how it would sound in a bright or dark SG because their pickups are consistent. What I'd like to see is the engineering knowledge that they have acumulated over the years about the components of a pickup and how they effect each other and the resultant sonic output. Some approximate guide lines in chart form would be nice. Like a coil chart based on some "standard" bobbin sizes with the differences in wire and winds defined. And a magnet table, with some "standard" shapes and materials and an approx- imation of their sonic personalities when mixed with certain coils/wire etc.... I'd buy 'em in a heartbeat. I'd also buy pre-wound bobbins, pole pieces, magnets, mounting hardware and other pickup stuff too If I could mix'n'match from the aforementioned charts. Like "Build your own Pickup" know what I mean? Maybe a couple of you real engineering guys could jam and line up the data. That would be great! |
|---|---|